{"id":6,"date":"2026-11-02T13:25:00","date_gmt":"2026-11-02T13:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/?p=6"},"modified":"2026-11-02T13:25:00","modified_gmt":"2026-11-02T13:25:00","slug":"how-90-big-companies-helped-fuel-climate-change-study-breaks-it-down-inside-climate-news-philsugar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/?p=6","title":{"rendered":"How 90 Big Companies Helped Fuel Climate Change: Study Breaks It Down – Inside Climate News | PhilSugar"},"content":{"rendered":"

Can millimeters of sea level rise or increments of warming on the globe\u2019s thermometer be attributed to specific energy companies? A new study attempts to do that, and says that more than a quarter of sea level rise and about half the warming from 1880 to 2010 can be traced back to just 90 corporations.
\nThe study comes as energy companies confront lawsuits and shareholder resolutions seeking to account for sugar dating scam warning signs<\/a> their contributions to climate change.
\nThe
\nnew paper
\n, published last week in the journal
\nClimatic Change,
\nbuilds on
\nearlier research
\nfinding that nearly two-thirds of historical greenhouse gas emissions came from the products and operations of just 90 companies\u2014mostly fossil fuel producers, plus a few cement companies.
\nThe researchers from the Union of Concerned Scientists and two universities took the reasoning another step and calculated how much of the actual change most popular sugar baby site Philippines<\/a> in the climate can be tied to those extra emissions.
\nUsing models, they calculated that the greenhouse gas emissions of these 90 companies accounted for around 42 to 50 percent of the global temperature increase and about 26 to 32 percent of global sea level rise over the course of industrial history, from 1880 to 2010. Since 1980, a time when global warming was first getting wide attention, their emissions have accounted for around 28 to 35 percent of rising temperatures and around 11 to 14 percent of rising seas.
\nWhile some of the companies are huge\u2014Chevron, Saudi Aramco, ExxonMobil, Gazprom\u2014even the sugar baby dating success<\/a> biggest of them weren\u2019t blamed for more than about 1 or 2 percent of the rising tides or temperatures.
\nThe next step, one of the authors suggested, would be to calculate the damages from those changes\u2014and decide if the companies should help pay for them.
\n\u201cWe know climate impacts are worsening and they\u2019re becoming more costly. The question is who\u2019s responsible and who should pay the costs,\u201d said Brenda Ekwurzel, the lead author of the paper and director of climate science at the Union of Concerned Scientists. \u201cIn the United States, taxpayers are footing the bill entirely. So maybe with numbers like this you can put in the mix the producers.\u201d
\nIn July, three local governments in California
\nsued a group of oil and gas
\ncompanies, arguing that executives knew for decades that the \u201cgreenhouse long term sugar arrangement<\/a> gas pollution from their fossil fuel products had a significant impact on the Earth\u2019s climate and sea levels.\u201d
\nThe state attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts, meanwhile, are investigating whether Exxon misled investors about its risks from climate change.
\nExxon and Chevron did not respond to requests for comment for this article. The American Petroleum Institute declined to comment.
\nEkwurzel said the paper is only a first step for trying to sort out who is responsible for what as the costs of climate change grow. \u201cWe can how to choose a sugar daddy<\/a> calculate these numbers, and we don\u2019t expect them to directly equal responsibility,\u201d she said. \u201cThat\u2019s really for juries, policymakers, civil society conversation going forward.\u201d
\nGenerally, state efforts to cap greenhouse gas emissions, such as California\u2019s cap-and-trade system, hold companies accountable only for their direct emissions. But just because it\u2019s fossil fuel consumers like power plants and drivers who ultimately burn the sugar daddy asking for load<\/a> coal, oil and gas that emit greenhouse gases, that doesn\u2019t let the producers off the hook, she added.
\n\u201cA common complaint is, what about utilities, what about car-driving,\u201d Ekwurzel said. \u201cThe thing is, is it the activities or is it how we\u2019ve chosen to power those activities? We know there are other ways to move through space or to turn on the lights that don\u2019t rely as much on fossil fuels.\u201d
\nAbout This Story
\nPerhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That\u2019s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 safe sugar dating sa Philippines<\/a> nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.
\nThat\u2019s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can\u2019t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We\u2019ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.
\nTwo of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.
\nDonations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don\u2019t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?
\nPlease take a moment paano pumili ng sugar baby<\/a> to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.
\nThank you,
\nDavid Sassoon
\nFounder and Publisher
\nVernon Loeb
\nExecutive Editor
\nShare This Article
\nRepublish
\nNicholas Kusnetz
\nReporter, New York
\nNicholas Kusnetz is a reporter for Inside Climate News. Before joining ICN, he worked at the Center for Public Integrity and ProPublica. His work has won numerous awards and citations, including from the Society of Professional Journalists, the Society of Environmental Journalists, the Overseas Press Club, the Society of American Business Editors and Writers and others. His articles have appeared in more than a dozen publications including Wired, The Washington Post, Businessweek, The Nation and The New York Times. Nicholas can be reached on Signal at
\nnkusnetz.15
\n.
\n[email protected]
\nThis story is funded active sugar dating sites Philippines<\/a> by readers like you.
\nOur nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of sugar daddy GCash scam<\/a> charge and advertising. Please donate now to support our work.
\nDonate Now
\nWelcome to Inside Climate News
\nTo continue reading, please enter your email address. Access to our nonprofit news is always free.
\nEmail Address
\nI agree to the
\nterms of service and privacy policy
\n.
\nI\u2019m already a subscriber<\/p>\n

<!– image: https:\/\/insideclimatenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/ClimateImpactBarCharts529px.png –>
\n<!– image: https:\/\/insideclimatenews.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/NicholasKusnetz-300×300.jpg –><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Can millimeters of sea level rise or increments of warming on the globe\u2019s thermometer be attributed to specific energy companies? A new study attempts to do that, and says that more than a quarter of sea level rise and about … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12,"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6\/revisions\/12"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/philisugarblog.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}